\n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
\n\tIf they are right about net-metering, it\u2019s for all the wrong reasons.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tThey want to stop solar photovoltaics (solar PV) now. They want to put it in the grave before it takes even more market share from their comfy business. Climate change and future generations be damned.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tThe utilities are under threat as never before. They see what\u2019s happened in Germany, where utility profits are plummeting as Germans take more and more control of their own electricity generation. Utility companies will be ruined if they let that happen here. So now\u2019s the time to kill net-metering and with it rooftop solar PV while they still can.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tMaybe we should let them.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tI can hear the howls of derision from the usual suspects: the solar PV industry, the solar leasing companies, and their sycophants in the advocacy community.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tYes, we should fight a rearguard action to keep the utilities and their legions of attorneys fully engaged. In the meantime, while the utilities are busy snuffing out net-metering, we can bypass them altogether and implement a far superior policy that will put a lot more solar on people\u2019s roofs\u2014solar that people can own themselves, independent of the banking industry offering them deals \u201cto good to be true.\u201d<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tAfter all, one of America\u2019s most revolutionary energy policies was introduced in 1978 when the utilities were too busy trying to kill another competing industry to notice as the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act (PURPA) passed Congress.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tPURPA allowed independently-owned renewable generators to be connected to the grid. Suddenly, the grid was no longer the utility industry\u2019s sole domain. PURPA said you could connect your solar PV system to the grid, but it didn\u2019t spell out how much you would get paid for your electricity.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tPURPA laid the foundation for what came next\u2014a policy that not only allowed you to connect to the grid, but that also set the price, a \u201ctariff\u201d in utility jargon, that you would be paid for the electricity you fed into the grid\u2014feed-in tariffs, or FITs.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tFeed-in tariffs are the alternative to net-metering and their time has come. FITs have been likened to PURPA on steroids and they are as American as apple pie. It was a crude feed-in tariff that launched renewable energy in California during the early 1980s. In that program, you could connect your biomass, wind, or solar plant to the grid, get paid a fixed-price for ten years, and then get paid a floating price for another twenty. And it worked\u2014spectacularly. For two decades following that first feed-in tariff, the Golden State generated about 2 percent of its electricity from wind energy alone.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tSince then, Europeans picked up the renewable energy torch, particularly in Denmark, where last year the Danes generated 43 percent of their electricity from biomass and wind energy, and in Germany.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tGermans don\u2019t use net-metering, and yet last year they produced one-fifth of their electricity from wind, solar, and biogas. No, the Germans use feed-in tariffs. They saw what we accomplished decades ago then set out to adapt and refine the concept. The result is a modern system of feed-in tariffs that has catapulted Germany to the front ranks of renewable energy development\u2014rooftop solar PV included.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tNumerous other countries around the world have followed suit, adopting feed-in tariffs of their own making. In fact, more countries use feed-in tariffs than use net-metering.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tMost significantly, more renewable energy\u2014by far\u2013has been developed with feed-in tariffs than has been installed through net-metering. The International Energy Agency found <\/span>in a recent study<\/a> that only 2 percent of solar PV worldwide was installed primarily through net-metering. The numbers are just as lopsided for wind energy, biogas, and other renewables.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tWhat sets modern feed-in tariffs apart from those developed in California during the early 1980s\u2014and from net-metering\u2013is that the price paid for electricity from different renewable sources differs as well.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tIn the old California system, a wind farm was paid the same price as a biomass plant or a solar plant, even though they were quite different from one another. The same is true today with net-metering. Each technology that runs the kilowatt-hour meter backwards is effectively paid the same price, the retail price of electricity, regardless of how much the electricity actually cost to produce.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tIn the modern or \u201cadvanced\u201d system like that used in Ontario, Canada, wind energy is paid one price and rooftop solar another. Each technology is paid a price that reflects the average cost of generating electricity with that technology.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tThis approach decouples the price paid for renewable energy from both the wholesale and retail prices of electricity. Feed-in laws essentially bypass all the ideological theory and arcane mumbo-jumbo that obscure electricity rate-setting in the US.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tFor each technology and each application, prices are determined so as to provide a fair and reasonable rate of return. This enables anyone\u2014anyone who wants to invest in building the infrastructure that will power America in the 21<\/span>st<\/sup> century\u2013to profit from renewable energy.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tIt is this simple idea\u2014to pay a fair price for renewable energy\u2014that has enabled German citizens to build and own nearly half of all the wind turbines, solar PV, and biogas plants in the country. Individual German citizens\u2014not their utility companies\u2013have invested more than $100 billion in renewable energy. They have done so because they are paid a fair price for their electricity and because they can install the size, type, and amount of renewables that is the most economic for them and the best fit for their communities.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tNet-metering served a useful purpose in the dark days of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton era. Net-metering then was a call to arms for hobbyists and guerrilla solar activists out to prove a point\u2013solar works, your meter will run backwards, and the lights will stay on.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tBut net-metering was never intended to be a policy for the industrial development of renewable energy. It alone can\u2019t do that. Retail electricity prices in North America are simply too low to make rooftop solar PV, for example, profitable without hefty subsidies.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tWhy run your kilowatt-hour meter backwards at 10 cents per kilowatt-hour when it costs you 20 cents to 30 cents per kilowatt-hour to generate it with solar PV? Without federal or state subsidies, net-metering seldom makes any economic sense, even today with the rapidly falling cost of solar PV.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tNet-metering was an appealing policy at one time, because it gave politicians the perfect cover for appearing to take action on the public\u2019s demand for renewable energy, while doing nothing of substance to threaten entrenched electric utilities\u2019 political and economic power.\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tThus, politicians would typically set a low limit on the amount of renewables that could be installed in a region under net-metering\u2014often just a few percent. They certainly wouldn\u2019t set the limit at anything like what the Germans (5 percent solar PV) or Italians (7 percent solar PV) have already accomplished.\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tMoreover, they typically also limit the size of any individual installation, often a paltry 10 kilowatts, and sometimes\u2014when they\u2019re generous\u2013up to 2 megawatts. (We certainly wouldn\u2019t want to rock the utility\u2019s boat, now, would we?)<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tWorst of all, net-metering limits renewable development to an existing \u201cmeter\u201d. This precludes \u201cgreenfield\u201d sites that don\u2019t already serve a utility customer, a further restriction on who can use net-metering and how big a renewable project they can build.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tWith all the restrictions on net-metering, many Americans are prohibited from installing and owning their own solar, wind, or biogas power plants where they want to and of the size that works best for them. Net-metering locks out apartment-dwellers and renters from participating in the renewable energy revolution.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tNet-metering is not\u2013nor can it ever be\u2013a comprehensive renewable energy policy. If we take climate change seriously, net-metering simply won\u2019t get us where we want to go: massive amounts of renewables in the ground, and quickly. Net-metering will never give us \u201cplus energy\u201d houses or \u201cplus energy\u201d buildings, because we often literally have to give our surplus electricity to the utility company for free. How fair is that?<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tYes, net-metering has served a purpose. And yes, we should not abandon it without a strong comprehensive renewable energy policy to replace it.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tBut the time has come from Americans to break free of the straight jacket imposed by net-metering. It is time to liberate Americans from the tyranny of utility-company control of our lives and from the politicians and regulators who serve these companies. It is time to free Americans of all walks of life\u2013from rich to poor, from conservative to liberal, from rural to urban\u2014to produce renewably generated electricity when they want, where they want, and in the amount they want\u2014and to do so for a profit. What could be more American?<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\tAs the late German politician Hermann Scheer, one of the co-founders of Germany\u2019s modern system of advanced renewable tariffs, frequently said, the time for half-measures\u2013for timid responses\u2013is past. There is no time to lose.<\/span>\n<\/p>\n \n\tsource: <\/span>http:\/\/energyblog.nationalgeographic.com\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\t\u00a0\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t5 reasons why you can become an Add-Energy Renewable Romania PARTNER<\/a><\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/span>\n\t\t<\/p>\n \n\t\t\tTo register your Company as ADD ENERGY PARTNER , please access \u00a0\u00a0 \n\t\t\tFor other informations click to\u00a0 \u00a0 But the utilities\u2019 populist appeal to fairness and equality is disingenuous. When did electric utilities ever care about justice\u2013or the poor? \u00a0 If they are right about net-metering, it\u2019s for all the wrong reasons. \u00a0 They want to stop solar photovoltaics (solar PV) now. They want to put it in the grave before it … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[277,33,349,250,80,31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-answers-to-your-requests","category-informatii-din-presa-internationala","category-international-press","category-news","category-raspunsuri-la-solicitarile-dumneavoastra","category-stiri-utile-noutati"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14586\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/add-energy.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"register_now_2\"](\"http:\/\/add-energy.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/register_now_2.png\")
<\/a><\/span> <\/span><\/span>\n\t\t<\/p>\n![\"Contact-Us\"](\"http:\/\/add-energy.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/Contact-Us.jpg\")
<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span>\n\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"